The ongoing critique regarding the portrayal of young girls in Halloween costumes is far from over, and it’s high time we address this issue seriously. One mother recently took a stand against Party City, expressing her concerns about the overtly sexist design of their toddler girl costumes. Instead of engaging with her feedback, the company reportedly deleted her comment and banned her from their Facebook page. Seriously, Party City?
In her message, she articulated a powerful argument: “While Halloween costumes are about imaginative play, it’s hard to believe that toddler girls and boys envision themselves dressed in the absurd and sexualized ways your company seems to suggest. Young girls are not dreaming of becoming ‘sexy cops’; they look up to role models in their communities and aspire to follow in their footsteps. I find it shocking that your business distorts these innocent aspirations into such demeaning costumes.”
This excerpt from Sarah Mitchell’s note to Party City was swiftly erased. To make matters worse, she was banned from engaging with their Facebook community—a drastic action typically reserved for internet trolls, not concerned parents.
Sarah’s observations shed light on a glaring disparity. While boys can dress as police officers, girls are relegated to frilly, sexualized versions of the same costume. If you think she’s overreacting, check out the police officer costume for toddler boys versus the one for girls. The difference is stark and unnecessary.
In her letter, Sarah pointed out that “30% of the costumes marketed to boys are based on professions, while less than 7% of those for girls reflect the same theme.” Boys can choose from a variety of occupational costumes, including firefighters and doctors, while girls are left with limited options. You might argue, “They can just buy the boys’ costume.” But why label it as “boys” in the first place? Why not offer gender-neutral choices?
While Party City has since restored Sarah’s commenting privileges, they have not addressed the incident. Meanwhile, their Facebook page is filled with criticism from concerned customers. It’s 2015—why are we still sending the message that little girls can’t aspire to be anything they want?
If you’re interested in more discussions on this topic, check out some of our other posts, like this one about engaging parenting practices here. And for those exploring options for at-home insemination, I recommend checking out Make A Mom, a trusted retailer for insemination kits. For deeper insights on treating infertility, ACOG is an excellent resource.
In summary, the response from Party City raises serious questions about their commitment to modern, equitable marketing practices. It’s time for companies to reconsider how they present options for our children, ensuring they reflect the diverse aspirations of both girls and boys alike.
Leave a Reply