Brock Turner is challenging his rape convictions by claiming that his attire during the incident should be taken into consideration. His attorney recently presented arguments to a panel of judges seeking to overturn his three felony convictions. Turner, who was convicted in 2016 for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman, contends that he only intended to engage in “outercourse” because he was fully clothed at the time of the assault.
Convictions and Sentencing
Turner was found guilty of assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated or unconscious person, penetration of an intoxicated person, and penetration of an unconscious person. He received a six-month sentence but served only three months in county jail. Originally, he faced a maximum of 14 years in state prison, but the presiding judge, whom many criticized for his leniency, argued that a longer sentence would have a detrimental effect on Turner’s life.
Turner’s Appeal
Since his release, Turner has become emblematic of the issues surrounding rape culture. His appeal is based on the argument that, because he was dressed when he assaulted his victim, he was not demonstrating an intent to commit rape. His legal team points to the fact that he was observed engaging in “aggressive thrusting” on top of an unconscious woman outside a fraternity party in 2015, which they claim indicates a lesser intent.
The Victim’s Experience
The victim’s underwear had been removed prior to the assault, and she later described her traumatic experience, awakening in a hospital confused and wounded. She recounted the moment she realized her underwear was missing, an act that highlighted the violation she endured. Meanwhile, Turner’s lack of accountability for his actions—apologizing only for drinking, rather than for the assault itself—has drawn widespread outrage.
Public Reaction
In a letter to the judge, Turner’s father lamented the loss of simple pleasures, like enjoying a steak dinner, as a consequence of his son’s conviction. The case has been riddled with insensitivity, from the media portrayal of Turner as a promising swimmer to the focus on the victim’s alcohol consumption rather than the assault itself. Turner’s appeal arguments only serve to further infuriate those who believe that survivors should never have to relive their trauma in the face of such insensitivity.
Women’s Rights and Safety
Women have every right to enjoy social events without fear of assault. The expectation should be that they can safely partake in festivities without the horror of waking up to such a traumatic experience. Turner’s appeal continues to be a painful reminder of a culture that often prioritizes the comfort of perpetrators over the dignity of survivors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Brock Turner’s attempt to appeal his convictions based on the argument of being fully clothed during the assault is not just an affront to justice but also a reflection of the pervasive issues in addressing sexual violence. The justices have 90 days to issue a ruling on this controversial case.