As discussions surrounding terrorism dominate the political landscape, the topic of refugees and their perceived risks often arises. Recently, a new executive order aimed at immigration will temporarily suspend the refugee program for 120 days, supposedly to protect national security. However, many apprehensions surrounding refugees stem from misconceptions. Below are five prevalent myths about refugees in the U.S. clarified:
1. Refugees Can’t Be Properly Vetted.
Contrary to popular belief, refugees undergo one of the most rigorous vetting processes of any group entering the United States. The vetting can last up to two years and involves multiple layers of security checks by both U.S. and UN agencies, with ongoing evaluations even after resettlement. If insufficient information is available, potential refugees are not admitted. It’s essential to recognize that refugees often flee terrorism themselves and are more likely to assist in combatting extremist threats.
2. Terrorists Can Easily Infiltrate the Refugee Program.
If terrorists were to attempt to infiltrate the refugee system, it would be a misguided strategy. The refugee program is among the most challenging pathways to enter the U.S. Less than 1% of those seeking refuge in another country are resettled elsewhere, and the selection process is not at the discretion of the refugees. Additionally, the extensive vetting process, lasting between 18 to 24 months, further minimizes any risk. In fact, it’s statistically far easier to enter the U.S. through a travel or work visa, as the refugee program’s vetting is much stricter. Research from the Cato Institute suggests that the likelihood of being killed in a terrorist attack by a refugee is 1 in 3.64 billion—far less than everyday dangers.
3. Crime Rates Have Increased in Europe; It Could Happen Here.
The notion that crime has surged in Europe due to refugees is misleading. While certain incidents have gained media attention, the overall data does not support a significant increase in crime attributable to refugees. In fact, immigrants tend to commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens. Furthermore, the scale of refugee resettlement in Europe, particularly in Germany, dwarfs that of the U.S. In 2015, Germany accepted a million refugees, significantly more than the U.S. did that year. The logistical challenges of managing such large numbers in Europe differ greatly from those in the U.S., where official programs facilitate refugee arrival.
4. Refugees Are a Financial Burden.
While there is an initial expense associated with refugee resettlement, studies show that refugees can have a cost-neutral or even positive economic impact over time. Research conducted by various institutions, including Texas A&M, indicates that once refugees are established, their contributions to the economy can exceed the costs incurred during their resettlement. This suggests that they may actually help address pressing social issues, such as providing housing for homeless veterans.
5. Refugees Take Jobs from Americans.
One reason refugees do not negatively impact the job market is that they are more likely to start businesses compared to native-born individuals. A 2010 analysis revealed that immigrants or their descendants founded 40% of Fortune 500 companies. Moreover, foreign-born workers often fill positions that are challenging to staff with U.S.-born workers. Rather than taking jobs, refugees meet labor shortages and create new employment opportunities.
It’s worth noting that after 9/11, the U.S. paused its refugee program for a mere 90 days to reassess security measures. Today, we see a more extended suspension amid a significant humanitarian crisis affecting millions, particularly in Syria. The empirical evidence indicates that the risk associated with refugees is minuscule, their economic contributions are beneficial, and they are less likely to engage in criminal activities compared to the average citizen. Why, then, are we closing our doors? The current suspension appears to stem from unfounded fears rather than factual analysis.
For further insights on related topics, check out our previous post on home insemination kits. Additionally, to learn more about artificial insemination methods, visit Make A Mom, a credible source in this area. For those interested in understanding infertility statistics, the CDC offers an excellent resource.
Summary
The myths surrounding refugees in America often lead to misconceptions about their vetting process, economic impact, and crime rates. Contrary to popular belief, refugees are subjected to extensive scrutiny, are less likely to commit crimes, and can positively contribute to the economy. The ongoing discourse should be informed by facts rather than fear.