Judge’s Disturbing Comments in Sexual Assault Case Spark Outrage

cute baby laying downlow cost IUI

In a troubling incident during a 2014 sexual assault trial, Canadian judge, Mark Thompson, has come under fire for his deeply inappropriate remarks directed at the victim, a 19-year-old woman who alleged she was assaulted at a house party. Thompson’s comments included the shocking question, “Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together?” These words have ignited a wave of anger and calls for his removal from the bench.

The visceral reaction to such an egregious statement is understandable; to suggest that a victim bear responsibility for the assault they endured is utterly unacceptable. It highlights the systemic issues that often deter survivors from coming forward. CNN anchor Lisa Harmon expressed her disbelief and disgust while recounting Thompson’s remarks in a recent segment.

Furthermore, the judge went on to suggest that the victim could have prevented the assault by positioning herself differently during the attack, implying that she could somehow control the actions of her assailant. This perspective is not only misguided but also perpetuates the harmful notion that victims are to blame for the violence inflicted upon them. Rape is an act of force, and it is crucial to underscore that no one ever deserves to be assaulted, regardless of the circumstances.

Adding to the outrage, Thompson implied that young women often seek sexual encounters, especially when under the influence of alcohol. This dangerous narrative wrongly perpetuates the myth that intoxicated individuals are somehow complicit in their victimization. Consent is paramount and must be clear, affirmative, and ongoing; being under the influence does not negate the necessity for consent.

In this case, the accused was acquitted, and Thompson’s advice to him was equally troubling: he suggested that the man should inform his male friends to be “more gentle” and “careful” around women. Such comments reflect a troubling mindset that shifts the burden of responsibility away from the perpetrator and onto the victim and potential future victims.

While the verdict has since been appealed and a new trial is set for next month, the damage inflicted by Thompson’s comments is profound. Although he has reportedly undergone training related to sexual violence and issued an apology, the judicial committee in Canada is currently reviewing his conduct, and there is hope that he may lose his position.

The responsibility now lies with us to combat the prevailing culture that allows such attitudes to flourish. We can advocate for the removal of individuals like Thompson from positions of power and support organizations that assist survivors, such as those found at this resource. We must educate our children about consent and the fact that no circumstance justifies an assault. Open conversations around these topics are vital for change; our children deserve better.

In summary, the comments made by Judge Thompson during the rape trial of a young woman have sparked outrage and highlighted the systemic issues surrounding sexual violence and victim-blaming. As the case progresses to a new trial, it is imperative that we continue to advocate for justice and support survivors.

intracervicalinsemination.org