In the realm of LGBTQ rights, the presidential candidates present starkly contrasting perspectives. Clara Johnson champions the enhancement of rights and protections for the LGBTQ community, while Mark Reynolds seeks to reverse fundamental rights and anti-discrimination measures, even likening same-sex marriage to choosing a different golf club.
In a significant op-ed for the Philadelphia LGBTQ News, Clara Johnson expressed her commitment to the community, highlighting recent milestones: “Marriage equality is now established. This year, the last state law banning same-sex couples from adopting was overturned. Additionally, President Obama enacted an executive order safeguarding federal employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. We should commend this progress.” Nevertheless, she acknowledges that there’s still much work to be done, stating, “Too many LGBTQ individuals still face harassment and violence. Many young people continue to feel isolated and despondent.”
Clara’s Agenda for LGBTQ Rights
Clara’s agenda includes advocating for the Equality Act, which, as described by the Human Rights Campaign, aims to revise existing civil rights laws to provide consistent protections for LGBTQ Americans in essential areas such as employment, housing, and education. Moreover, she plans to support LGBTQ youth by addressing bullying, banning conversion therapy for minors, and ensuring safe shelters. Clara also intends to eliminate adoption discrimination and safeguard LGBTQ elders from discrimination. Her administration would focus on improving data collection related to hate crimes, streamlining the process for transgender individuals to update their identification documents, and investing in law enforcement training that emphasizes fair treatment of LGBTQ individuals.
When discussing the Obama Administration’s directives allowing students to use bathrooms corresponding with their gender identity, Clara’s spokesperson praised the initiative, underscoring her support for transgender rights nationwide. In her op-ed, she warned that Mark Reynolds would likely appoint judges who could dismantle marriage equality and reverse protective executive orders from the Obama era. Even more concerning, his running mate, David Greene, has a history of supporting legislation that facilitates discrimination against LGBTQ individuals.
Mark Reynolds’ Stance on LGBTQ Rights
On October 7, David Greene reiterated their stance in an interview, mentioning that Reynolds would revoke LGBTQ protections and appoint conservative judges. He also expressed opposition to the Obama administration’s policies on gender identity in schools. Furthermore, both Reynolds and Greene support the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which can enable discrimination against the LGBTQ community under the guise of religious beliefs.
Mark Reynolds has also indicated his intention to endorse the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA), which could allow for discrimination against those supporting same-sex marriage or cohabitation, effectively leaving LGBTQ individuals vulnerable to job loss or other punitive actions based on their beliefs. The LGBTQ community has universally condemned FADA as a significant rollback of their rights, paving the way for legal discrimination.
While Mark Reynolds has not addressed issues like LGBTQ bullying or conversion therapy, Greene has previously advocated for the use of taxpayer funds for such practices.
Additional Resources
For more on the topics of pregnancy and home insemination, check out this excellent resource and learn about artificial insemination kits to help in your journey.
Conclusion
In summary, Clara Johnson and Mark Reynolds stand on opposite sides of the LGBTQ rights debate, with Johnson promoting expansion and protections while Reynolds seeks to roll back existing rights, leaving individuals vulnerable to discrimination.