Couple Faces Charges for Skin-to-Skin Contact After C-Section in the U.S.

cute baby laying downhome insemination syringe

In the land where the unexpected is often the norm, a Reddit user named Jake and his wife recently shared a perplexing charge they discovered on their hospital bill following her C-section last month. Along with the costs for the delivery and a lactation consultant visit, they found they were billed for the privilege of holding their newborn. While it’s surprising, it also brings back memories of an outrageous $300 fee for a band-aid during a previous ER visit.

In a thread titled “I was charged $39.95 to hold my child after birth,” Jake posted an image of the bill, which indeed included a line item for “skin to skin after c-sec.” The reaction is priceless: how can this be?! Shouldn’t this be a complimentary experience? One can only imagine what would happen if they attempted any kisses—would they need to sell their home?

Jake recounted the experience on Reddit: “During the C-section, the nurse asked my wife if she wanted to do skin-to-skin after the baby was born, and of course, she said yes. The nurse let me hold the baby on my wife’s chest and even borrowed my camera to snap a few pictures for us. We just noticed it on the bill today and couldn’t help but laugh.”

In response, a labor and delivery nurse chimed in to clarify the situation: “Performing ‘skin to skin’ in the operating room requires an extra staff member to supervise the baby. This practice is relatively new and mandates a second Labor and Delivery RN to ensure the baby’s safety.” While this explanation may sound ludicrous, it makes a bit more sense when considering liability issues—something all too familiar in the U.S. healthcare landscape.

This scenario isn’t solely the fault of the doctors or nurses; it reflects the convoluted nature of our insurance system. Americans who have given birth are acutely aware of the exorbitant costs involved. One Reddit user who delivered twins shared her experience of being billed separately for each baby: “I had twins, but during my pregnancy, my ultrasounds were charged as ‘fetus’ and ‘additional fetus.’ It felt unfair that my C-section cost double when they didn’t have to prep and cut me twice; just reach back in and grab the other one!”

When compared to the costs incurred by parents in other countries, it’s astounding. A couple of Canadians recounted their experiences with birth expenses: “For our singleton, we ended up paying $12.” “Mine was free! Oh, wait, we had to shell out $8 for parking.”

International Reddit users expressed disbelief at the situation. One remarked, “The last thing we want is for new parents to face homelessness due to exorbitant birth costs. I can’t fathom how anyone in America can afford to have kids. No parental leave, no decent daycare, $13,000 for childbirth—did you all win the lottery or something?”

It’s easy to overlook the absurdity of our system until we engage with those from other nations. One commenter noted, “You all. This is absurd. The U.S. is the only developed country without state-funded healthcare. How can this not be viewed as a basic human right?”

This charge for skin-to-skin contact perfectly illustrates the pressing need for healthcare reform in the United States. To his credit, Jake maintains a positive outlook, stating, “Everyone involved in our experience was wonderful, and we left with a smile.”

For more insights into home insemination and fertility, check out articles on Progyny or discover helpful resources like Make a Mom to boost fertility. If you’re interested in learning more about our policies, feel free to visit our terms and conditions.

Summary

A couple in the U.S. was charged for holding their baby skin-to-skin after a C-section, sparking discussions about the absurdity of healthcare costs. While the charge has drawn laughter and disbelief, it also highlights the need for reform in the healthcare system, which often leads to exorbitant charges for basic services.

intracervicalinsemination.org