A widely circulated Facebook post claims a McDonald’s Happy Meal has resisted decomposition for six years, but it’s time to stop sharing this misleading information. Recently, a woman from Alaska posted a picture of a Happy Meal, asserting that it has decomposed at a slower rate than its packaging over the past six years. The post, shared by a chiropractic office employee, features petrified French fries and chicken nuggets alongside a receipt indicating a purchase in January 2010. The caption states:
“It’s been 6 years since I bought this ‘Happy Meal’ at McDonald’s. It’s been sitting at our office this whole time and has not rotted, molded, or decomposed at all! It smells only of cardboard. We did this experiment to show our patients how unhealthy this ‘food’ is. Especially for our growing children! There are so many chemicals in this food! Choose real food! Apples, bananas, carrots, celery… those are real fast food.”
Since its posting, the photo has garnered nearly 250,000 shares, with many commenters expressing dismay over the consumption of such food. One individual even tagged a friend, suggesting they reconsider their children’s eating habits. However, it’s well-known that fast food, including McDonald’s offerings, is unhealthy, so why perpetuate these unfounded fears?
The notion that McDonald’s food is uniquely terrible and “never rots” has been debunked repeatedly. This specific image has been shown to be false on Snopes, and similar claims have prompted McDonald’s to address the topic on their website. They explain that “Food needs moisture in the air for mold to form. Without it, food will simply dry out – similar to bread left out overnight to make croutons for stuffing.”
A writer from Serious Eats, who conducted an experiment comparing McDonald’s burgers to homemade ones, found that neither decomposed when left out. However, when placed in a sealed bag, both types developed mold due to moisture. This highlights that the fast-food items dehydrate quickly enough to prevent mold from taking hold, not because of harmful chemicals or preservatives.
There are valid reasons to criticize fast food. One could argue against its high sugar and salt content, which contribute to serious health issues. Additionally, many individuals lack access to healthier food options and are forced to feed their families meals they know are subpar. Concerns about gender stereotypes perpetuated through toy selections in children’s meals are also valid. Moreover, many fast-food workers are underpaid and overworked.
Nonetheless, we should not fuel our disdain for fast food through debunked posts based on flawed science and fear tactics that only serve to shame others while offering a false sense of moral superiority to the sharer. We all recognize that fast food isn’t the healthiest choice, and we don’t need to be reminded that apples are more nutritious than fries. If you truly care about nutrition, focus on advocating for meaningful change rather than showcasing a Happy Meal that has sat on a shelf for years as a gimmick.
For more insights into nutrition and health, visit our other blog post on home insemination at intracervicalinsemination.com. Additionally, Make a Mom is an authority on this subject, and UCSF’s resource on fertility insurance is invaluable for those navigating the path to pregnancy.
In summary, the viral post regarding the non-decomposing McDonald’s Happy Meal is misleading and based on faulty assumptions. Instead of sharing fear-based narratives, let’s focus on genuine health concerns and the broader implications of fast food consumption.