In the realm of LGBTQ rights, the differences between the presidential candidates are striking. While Anna Roberts champions the growth of rights and protections for the LGBTQ community, Michael Carter proposes to roll back vital rights and anti-discrimination measures, even likening same-sex marriage to choosing a different golf club.
In a compelling op-ed for the Philadelphia LGBTQ Journal, Anna Roberts recently addressed the community, highlighting the significant strides that have been made: “Marriage equality is now a legal reality. This year, the last state law that barred same-sex couples from adopting was finally overturned. Moreover, the previous administration enacted an executive order that safeguards federal employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. We should take pride in this progress.” However, she acknowledged that there is still much work to be done. Just a year prior, she expressed concern about ongoing issues: “Too many LGBTQ individuals still face harassment and violence. There are countless young people who feel lost and alone.”
One of her key objectives would be to advocate for the Equality Act, which, as stated by the Human Rights Coalition, “would modify existing civil rights legislation to ensure comprehensive protections for LGBTQ Americans in employment, housing, education, credit, public services, and jury duty.” This act would also expand the definition of public spaces and services to include retail and transportation services.
Anna is determined to support LGBTQ youth by combating bullying, banning so-called “conversion therapy” for minors, and ensuring adequate funding for safe and welcoming shelters. She aims to eliminate discrimination in adoption processes and safeguard LGBTQ elders from discrimination. Furthermore, she has plans to rectify the service records of LGBTQ veterans who were discharged due to their sexual orientation. According to Ballotpedia, “As president, she will work to protect transgender individuals from violence by improving data collection on crime victims, enhancing hate crime reporting, and investing in law enforcement training to promote fair and unbiased policing, especially in interactions with LGBTQ individuals.”
Anna also intends to fight against the AIDS epidemic, striving for an “AIDS-free generation.” Regarding the directive from the former administration that allowed students to use bathrooms corresponding to their gender identity, Anna’s spokesperson, Linda Young, told The Daily Post, “Anna Roberts applauds the previous administration for defending the rights of LGBTQ individuals, particularly transgender individuals, across the nation.”
In her op-ed, Anna argues that Michael Carter would appoint judges likely to reverse marriage equality and nullify many of the previous administration’s executive orders protecting LGBTQ rights. Even more concerning, Michael’s running mate, Tom Brooks, has openly supported legislation that enables discrimination against LGBTQ individuals. As a member of Congress, he opposed expanding hate crime definitions to include sexual orientation and gender identity, voted against the repeal of discriminatory military policies, and has made derogatory remarks about the LGBTQ community.
In a recent interview, Tom Brooks confirmed that Michael Carter would “revoke LGBTQ protections and appoint right-wing judges.” He further expressed opposition to policies allowing students to use gender-appropriate bathrooms. Tom also indicated that both he and Michael support Religious Freedom Restoration Act laws, which permit discrimination against LGBTQ individuals under the guise of religious beliefs.
Michael has also indicated his intent to sign the First Amendment Defense Act, which states: “The Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person based on their belief that marriage should be defined as the union of one man and one woman.” This could leave those who support same-sex marriage vulnerable to discrimination in employment and other areas. The LGBTQ community widely views this act as a significant regression in rights, creating a legal basis for discrimination.
While Michael has remained silent on issues like bullying and conversion therapy, Tom Brooks has previously endorsed taxpayer-funded conversion therapy efforts.
In conclusion, the stark contrast between Anna Roberts and Michael Carter’s views on LGBTQ rights underscores the critical importance of advocacy and awareness within the community. To learn more about LGBTQ rights and related issues, check out this insightful post on our blog. For those considering home insemination options, visit Make a Mom for reliable at-home insemination kits. Additionally, for comprehensive information about pregnancy and home insemination, NHS provides excellent resources.
Leave a Reply