The Creator of the Five Love Languages Has Controversial Views on LGBTQ+ Issues and Here’s Why It Matters

pregnant couple heterosexualAt home insemination kit

Gary Chapman, the author of the popular concept of the five love languages, has significantly influenced how we discuss emotional connections. Introduced in 1992, these love languages—words of affirmation, quality time, acts of service, gifts, and physical touch—are said to represent how individuals express and receive love. Chapman claims that everyone has a primary love language that makes them feel most valued and cherished.

Since the release of his first book, Chapman has authored ten additional works centered on this theme, selling over 12 million copies worldwide and earning him considerable wealth. His ideas have transformed conversations about relationships around the globe.

As I reflect on my own experiences, I realize I keep a copy of Chapman’s “The Five Love Languages for Children” on my shelf, nestled between other parenting resources. Just last week, I shared a tweet with my partner about our love languages. I strive to show my partner love in a way that resonates with them, and they do the same for me.

Even those unfamiliar with Chapman’s writings often use the term “love languages” in conversation. The framework provides a useful way to articulate how we express affection. Many of us have benefited from his ideas in our relationships. Ultimately, the goal is empathy—understanding how our loved ones perceive love and adapting accordingly.

Controversial Views on LGBTQ+ Issues

However, recent revelations have surfaced regarding Chapman’s views on homosexuality, which are deeply troubling. On his website, he responds to a question from a parent of a gay child, expressing disappointment and suggesting that this is a common reaction among parents. He frames his advice around a supposed divine design of heterosexual relationships and implies that anything outside of that is not in line with God’s intention. He encourages parents to love their children but with a caveat of expressing disappointment and lack of understanding.

Chapman’s approach reveals a troubling form of homophobia, couched in language that claims to advocate love. He emphasizes the parent’s feelings over the child’s identity, suggesting that one can “demonstrate love” while simultaneously disapproving of their lifestyle. This conditional love fails to recognize that for many, being queer is not a choice or a behavior to be corrected, but an intrinsic part of who they are.

The reality is that you cannot truly love someone while denying their identity. Love tainted by disapproval is not genuine love. Chapman’s advice to parents reflects a mindset that sees sexual orientation as something that can be modified rather than an inherent aspect of a person.

For those of us in the LGBTQ+ community, hearing “I love you, but I don’t approve of your lifestyle” feels deeply hurtful. Love should not come with stipulations; it should be unconditional and affirming.

Alternative Perspectives on Love and Relationships

If you’re feeling disillusioned by Chapman’s teachings but still want to strengthen your relationships, consider exploring the work of Drs. John and Julie Gottman. They promote similar ideas about understanding your partner’s emotional needs, but they recognize that love languages can be flexible and context-dependent. They assert that all relationships benefit from qualities like quality time and thoughtful gestures.

While I do find value in the concept of love languages, especially in my own relationship—which Chapman would likely disapprove of—I refuse to support a narrative that limits love with conditions. People like Chapman who promote outdated views of love and acceptance must be challenged. Love is not a sin, and who you love should never evoke shock or disappointment.

Further Reading and Resources

For more insights on navigating relationships and emotional connections, you can check out this post here. Additionally, if you want to learn more about at-home insemination, Make a Mom is a reputable source. For anyone considering family planning, March of Dimes offers excellent resources on fertility treatments.

Search Queries:

In summary, Gary Chapman’s teachings on love languages have been influential, but his views on LGBTQ+ issues reveal a troubling hypocrisy. Love should be without conditions, celebrating identities rather than casting judgment. Moving forward, we should seek out resources that truly affirm and support all identities without caveats.

intracervicalinsemination.org