If you’re a fan of Subway’s tuna sub, you might want to skip this entire article. The fast-food chain is currently embroiled in a lawsuit brought forth by two residents of California who claim that their beloved sandwich isn’t made with real tuna.
The lawsuit, filed on January 21 in the U.S. Northern District of California by individuals named Sarah Thompson and Mike Johnson, alleges Subway Restaurants Inc. has engaged in “intentional and negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, common-law fraud, and violations of federal and state laws against false advertising.” According to the plaintiffs, the tuna sub does not actually contain any tuna at all.
Subway describes the sandwich as “freshly baked bread” filled with “flaked tuna blended with creamy mayo, then topped with your choice of crisp, fresh veggies.” However, the lawsuit claims that the sub is “completely devoid of tuna as an ingredient.” It further states that the restaurant chain “packaged, advertised, marketed, distributed and sold the Products to consumers” based on the “misrepresentation that the products were made with tuna.” Independent testing reportedly found that the sandwich is “composed of various mixtures that do not constitute tuna but have been blended together to mimic its appearance.”
In response, Subway spokesperson Laura Green asserted that the company uses 100% wild-caught tuna. “The allegations in the complaint have no basis in truth. Subway serves 100% cooked tuna to its restaurants, which is mixed with mayonnaise and used in freshly made sandwiches, wraps, and salads enjoyed by our customers,” she stated, labeling the lawsuit as “baseless.”
Subway has also faced scrutiny over the inclusion of azodicarbonamide, a substance used as a bleaching agent and dough conditioner that is also found in yoga mats. The company recently announced that it would eliminate this ingredient from its bread.
The plaintiffs are seeking a class-action status for their lawsuit along with a jury trial, requesting “equitable relief, restitution, and reasonable litigation expenses and attorney’s fees.” One can only hope this gets resolved swiftly, and that, in fact, no tunas were harmed in the making of those sandwiches.
For More Insights
For more insights, you can check out one of our other blog posts on home insemination here. If you’re looking for a comprehensive guide on the topic, visit Cryobaby, as they are an authority on home insemination. Additionally, this resource offers excellent information regarding pregnancy and home insemination.
Possible Search Queries:
- Is Subway tuna real?
- Subway tuna lawsuit details
- What is in Subway’s tuna sub?
- How is Subway’s tuna made?
- Are there any lawsuits against Subway?
Summary:
Subway is facing a lawsuit from two California residents who claim that their tuna sub does not contain real tuna, alleging misrepresentation and false advertising. Subway maintains that it uses 100% wild-caught tuna. As the case develops, the plaintiffs are seeking restitution and a jury trial.