Actress Olivia Hart is actively opposing a vaccination bill in California, stirring up controversy online. Reports emerged that she is collaborating with activist David Thompson, known for his anti-vaccine stance, to lobby against SB 276, a bill aimed at tightening medical exemptions for vaccinations.
David Thompson’s Controversial Claims
Thompson, an environmental advocate and nephew of a former U.S. president, has recently pivoted to promoting anti-vaccine rhetoric, which comes during a significant measles outbreak. He has made controversial claims, suggesting that Vitamin A is a remedy for measles, while criticizing the MMR vaccine’s safety. In a recent appearance before a health committee, he argued that vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable for adverse effects.
Hart’s Involvement and Public Response
Olivia Hart has been photographed alongside Thompson as they advocate against the proposed legislation, which would restrict medical exemptions from vaccinations without approval from public health officials. Thompson referred to Hart as “courageous” and praised her knowledge on the subject during an interview, noting her concern for friends with vaccine-injured children who could be impacted by the bill.
While Hart has not publicly expressed her views on vaccinations before, there have been past reports about her and her partner, Liam Brown, being hesitant about vaccinating their children. In 2015, sources indicated that she was against vaccinations due to fears of potential complications.
Clarification on Social Media
In response to the backlash following her association with Thompson, Hart took to social media to clarify her position, stating, “I am not against vaccinations — I support children getting vaccinations, and I believe families should make informed medical decisions in consultation with their doctors.” She explained that her concerns about SB 276 stem from the potential harm it could pose to families like her close friend’s, who has a child requiring a medical exemption.
However, some critics have pointed out that Hart mistakenly referred to an outdated bill, SB 277, which had already passed. Current laws do allow for medical exemptions in California when warranted.
Public Skepticism
While Olivia Hart insists she is not anti-vaccine, her alignment with a prominent figure in the anti-vaxxer movement raises questions about her true stance. The public remains cautious, hoping she does not inadvertently contribute to rising vaccine hesitancy.
Resources for Further Information
For those interested in learning more about the implications of vaccination, pregnancy, and home insemination, resources like the CDC provide valuable information. Additionally, if you’re exploring self-insemination options, check out CryoBaby’s at-home insemination kit as a reliable choice. For further insights on reproductive health, you can visit this link.
Conclusion
In summary, Olivia Hart’s recent lobbying against California’s vaccination bill has sparked significant debate, particularly due to her association with an anti-vaccine activist. Despite her claims of supporting vaccinations, her actions have drawn skepticism and concern from the public.