As a child in the 1980s, I fondly recall Big Bird’s earnest attempts to convince adults about his friend Mr. Snuffleupagus. It saddened me when no one believed him. However, in 1985, a series of distressing news reports surfaced about child abuse in daycare centers across America. Sesame Street recognized the potential harm of teaching children that their imaginative stories could be dismissed. Thus, they introduced Mr. Snuffleupagus, a pivotal moment aimed at empowering children to speak out and trust that adults would listen.
This is just one of many instances demonstrating how PBS has profoundly influenced an entire generation, conveying the vital message that children’s voices hold significance. As a parent, I deeply value this mission. While I am willing to invest in quality programming for my kids, many families living in poverty rely on PBS for early literacy and math skills, lessons in equality, and the encouragement of creativity.
It is shocking that the Trump administration would consider cutting funding for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and PBS, both essential components of federal cultural programming. A revealing report from ProPublica in 2012 highlighted that these funds represent a mere 0.012 percent of the $3.8 trillion federal budget—around $1.35 per person annually. In contrast, other countries allocate significantly more: Canada spends $22.48 per citizen, while Denmark invests $101 per citizen.
The underlying issue often overlooked is the conservative stance towards the arts. They dismiss the arts as “welfare for the elite.” Yet, how can teaching children—especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds—essential skills and fostering imagination be considered elitist? This notion is absurd.
When examining National Public Radio (NPR), it becomes clear why conservative politicians have targeted it for years due to its center-left reporting. They argue that taxpayers shouldn’t fund news that contradicts their beliefs. Yet, isn’t that akin to asking taxpayers to support initiatives that impose religious beliefs in schools? The hypocrisy is glaring. Critics of cultural programming overlook that it costs us a minuscule fraction of the federal budget—0.001%—yet they readily endorse military spending, including Trump’s push to expand naval fleets during a time of relative peace.
As a parent and taxpayer, I find it appalling that the Trump administration would even consider slashing funding for the NEA, which encompasses PBS and NPR. Children deserve access to quality programming, regardless of their socio-economic status. It is fundamentally unethical to leave cultural programming to private interests. This is classist, elitist, and disproportionately harmful to marginalized communities. We cannot accept this.
For more insights into home insemination, check out our other blog post here. Additionally, if you’re looking for authoritative resources on artificial insemination, visit Make a Mom and UCSF’s Center, both excellent sources.
In summary, the need for PBS and NPR is vital for nurturing future generations, providing them with the tools to grow, learn, and express themselves. It is crucial that we protect these resources from unjust cuts that would only serve to widen the gap in educational and cultural access.