In the wake of the recent Women’s March, conservative commentator John Morgan took to social media to express his bewilderment over the event, questioning why women felt compelled to march at all. Instead of engaging with the multitude of voices advocating for their rights, he opted to dismiss the movement entirely, asserting that there was no need for such protests.
In a blog post, he challenged readers to identify any rights that men enjoy in America that women do not. His underlying message seemed to suggest that women should simply be thankful for the rights they already possess, rather than advocating for more.
Morgan claimed that women in America are not subject to institutional or legal victimization. However, this perspective overlooks the historical context of oppression and discrimination that women and marginalized communities have faced. Just because certain legal protections exist today does not negate the ongoing challenges related to sexism and inequality. To disregard the struggles of those who march is to ignore the realities faced by many.
He noted, “Instances of violence against women are illegal, so there’s no reason to protest.” However, it’s crucial to understand that the impact of such violence extends far beyond the legal framework. Many women do not seek medical help after experiencing intimate partner violence, often because they lack faith in the legal system. This leads to significant economic and social repercussions, including lost workdays and the inability to support their families.
Morgan went on to claim that women have a unique legal right that men do not: the right to terminate a pregnancy. However, the motivations behind the Women’s March were not centered on this issue alone. Many participants were advocating for the preservation of essential services, such as those provided by Planned Parenthood, which offers vital health care to countless individuals. If funding for such services is cut, the consequences could be dire for hundreds of thousands of women.
He issued a challenge for anyone who supported the Women’s March to name a right that women lack compared to men. In response, it’s important to recognize that systemic issues cannot be adequately addressed through such a narrow lens. Just because an injustice doesn’t directly affect you doesn’t mean it isn’t real for others.
The Women’s March was a demonstration of free speech and a continuation of the struggles fought by those before us who sought equality and justice. Social change has never come from silence; it thrives on voices raised in protest. To think otherwise is to be on the wrong side of history.
For anyone interested in exploring more about pregnancy and home insemination options, I recommend checking out this excellent resource on pregnancy as well as this insightful blog post on related topics. Additionally, for authoritative information on home insemination, this source is worth a visit.
In summary, the dismissal of the Women’s March by figures like Morgan reflects a broader misunderstanding of the complex issues women face today. Advocacy and protest are essential for progress and should not be underestimated.