As the saying goes, “It’s the economy, folks.” The United States is currently facing an economic downturn, grappling with job losses due to overseas competition and technological advancements. Two prominent figures with contrasting views on economic recovery are Mary Johnson and Kevin Smith. Johnson advocates for increased taxes, while Smith proposes significant cuts. Johnson aims to create new job opportunities, while Smith focuses on bringing back those that have been lost. Their economic strategies differ significantly, with Johnson favoring a blend of social programs and reforms, in contrast to Smith’s reliance on free-market principles.
Mary Johnson’s Economic Strategy
Mary Johnson emphasizes that “the true measure of our success will be determined by the rise in incomes for hardworking Americans.” She notes that instead of gaining access to “good-paying jobs,” many Americans find themselves in low-wage positions. To uplift the dwindling middle class, Johnson plans to implement tax cuts for them and make college more affordable through initiatives such as tuition-free education at in-state schools. Her proposals also include raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to a more livable $12 an hour, enhancing union support, rebuilding infrastructure, investing in clean energy, and capping childcare costs at 10% of family income.
Her comprehensive economic strategy consists of five main components:
- Jobs Bill: The passage of a significant jobs bill within her first 100 days, aimed at investing in infrastructure, manufacturing, technology, clean energy, and small businesses. This initiative would focus on creating jobs through direct investments in maintaining and building essential infrastructure like roads and bridges. Johnson also plans to veto trade agreements that fail to generate sufficient high-paying jobs and aims to position the U.S. as a leader in clean energy.
- Student Debt Relief: Targeting student debt relief to make college accessible and affordable for all Americans.
- Corporate Practices: Altering corporate practices to ensure that more profits are shared with employees rather than shifted overseas. Johnson argues for the necessity to address income inequality, stating, “Inequality is too high, wages are too low, and it’s too hard to get ahead.” She proposes raising the minimum wage and cracking down on companies that avoid U.S. taxes by moving profits abroad.
- Tax Increases: Increasing taxes on corporations and the wealthy, introducing a new surcharge for multi-millionaires and billionaires. She believes that the financial industry has disproportionately benefited a select few while neglecting long-term value creation. Johnson asserts, “We need an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top.”
- Family-Friendly Policies: Implementing family-friendly policies that guarantee paid leave, equal pay for women, and support for housing and childcare costs, providing Americans with more security in their retirement and healthcare.
Kevin Smith’s Economic Philosophy
On the other hand, Kevin Smith’s economic philosophy centers on creating an environment conducive to hiring and investment. According to his campaign materials, “all economic policy must be directed at making it simpler to hire, invest, and produce in America.” In September 2016, he articulated that the foundation of economic growth lies in reforming the tax code and trade policies to foster job creation domestically.
Smith’s plan comprises four key components:
- Tax Reform: Aiming to streamline the tax code, which includes simplifying taxes, reducing rates for all individuals, and notably lowering corporate taxes. His tax reform proposals are expected to benefit wealthier households significantly, potentially creating a $9.5 trillion gap in federal revenue over the next decade unless accompanied by substantial spending cuts.
- Regulatory Review: Contending that excessive regulations hinder job creation and wage growth, Smith vows to review and eliminate regulations that impede economic expansion. He specifically targets environmental regulations, arguing that they stifle growth and job opportunities. “We’re going to eliminate job-killing regulations,” he proclaimed.
- Trade Reform: Another cornerstone of Smith’s strategy involves renegotiating trade agreements like NAFTA and labeling China a currency manipulator. His administration would impose tariffs on countries that violate trade rules, asserting that the existing trade deficit has harmed American jobs, particularly in manufacturing, and exacerbated poverty.
- Energy Policy: Smith’s energy policy emphasizes rolling back executive actions detrimental to job creation and reviving the fossil fuel sector. He aims to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and lift restrictions on domestic energy production, claiming these actions would boost economic growth and job creation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Mary Johnson and Kevin Smith offer distinctly different visions for the U.S. economy, with Johnson advocating for a more interventionist approach focused on social equity and Smith emphasizing deregulation and tax cuts to stimulate growth. Understanding these differing economic strategies is crucial for voters as they consider their options.
For additional insights on related topics, check out this excellent resource for pregnancy and home insemination and learn more about effective tools for home insemination at Make A Mom.