In typical fashion, Kim Johnson found a way to make last week’s heartfelt interview with Bruce Parker, conducted by Diane Parker, all about herself. I must admit, it was a bit surprising to hear Diane mention that while Bruce’s two other ex-wives offered ABC supportive remarks about his transition, Kim had “chosen not to comment.” This is quite the twist for someone who has built a career on showcasing her family’s ups and downs on reality TV!
When celebrity blogger Rick Hilton called out Kim’s silence on Twitter, she quickly responded with her own tweet, capped off with a cheeky “LOL” – you know, the classic move to soften a jab. Meanwhile, ABC remains firm in their support of Diane. According to reports, the network reached out to Kim several times without any replies. “ABC News made multiple attempts via email and phone,” they stated. “They got a response saying no comment.”
Trying to clarify the situation, Kim later tweeted in support of Bruce’s choice. A source close to her claimed that a message was left asking her for fact-checking, but Kim asserted she couldn’t respond since she hadn’t watched the special. She didn’t technically say “no comment.” So basically, tomato, to-mah-to! If Kim didn’t utter the exact phrase “no comment” yet didn’t offer any input, isn’t that kind of the same thing?
But let’s be real for a second: In light of Bruce’s courageous decision to share a lifelong secret, why are we even investing this much energy into it? For more insights on similar topics, check out this post on home insemination kits here and explore the authority on this subject at Make A Mom. Also, if you’re looking for excellent information on pregnancy, visit NICHD.
In summary, Kim Johnson’s attempt to shift the focus back to herself amidst Bruce Parker’s significant announcement raises questions about priorities in such sensitive issues.