In a recent Senate hearing, U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos declined to affirm that private schools receiving federal funding would be barred from discriminating against LGBTQ students. During her testimony before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, DeVos stated that the Department of Education would not funnel taxpayer money to private institutions that violate federal anti-discrimination laws. However, she acknowledged the absence of explicit protections for LGBTQ students, effectively shrugging off concerns regarding discrimination.
DeVos’ proposed budget suggests significant cuts to public school funding, redirecting that money towards school choice programs, which would allow more students to attend private and religious schools. At the hearing, she asserted that the Department of Education would not provide guidance on discrimination matters beyond existing federal law. This approach implies that private schools could potentially receive federal funds while still denying admission based on gender identity, sexual orientation, or even religious beliefs.
When pressed by Senator Alex Johnson (D-CA) about the implications of her stance, DeVos stated, “Where the law is unclear, we will not be issuing directives. That’s a responsibility for Congress and the courts.” Johnson challenged her assertion, suggesting that under her policy, discrimination could persist in schools that receive public funds. DeVos maintained that any institution accepting federal dollars must comply with federal laws, without discrimination.
DeVos has previously expressed similar views, indicating a preference for leaving such crucial issues to the discretion of individual states. “We believe parents are best suited to make decisions about their children’s education. States and localities should determine these frameworks,” she clarified. This decentralized approach raises concerns, as it could result in a fragmented system where LGBTQ families might have to relocate to ensure their children’s educational opportunities.
Critics have voiced their outrage over DeVos’ statements, including advocacy groups for civil rights and LGBTQ students. Sarah Jennings, director of the Equality Alliance, condemned the notion of allowing private schools to discriminate while still receiving federal support. “Her withdrawal of essential guidelines that protected transgender students has been rejected by the courts,” Jennings stated. “It is unacceptable for DeVos to suggest that federal funds could support discrimination.”
For more insights on related topics, check out this article on home insemination techniques. Additionally, for comprehensive resources on artificial insemination, visit Make a Mom. For those interested in in-vitro fertilization, Healthline offers excellent guidance.
In summary, Betsy DeVos’ refusal to commit to protecting LGBTQ students in private schools, coupled with her stance on funding and state discretion, has sparked significant criticism. Her approach raises concerns about the potential for discrimination against vulnerable student populations in federally funded institutions.