As a child, I lived with a constant fear that something terrible would happen to my mother. Each morning before school, I was consumed by anxiety that my home would be empty upon my return. I watched her closely, declining sleepover invitations from friends because I feared that even a moment away could lead to disaster. Nights often found me on my mother’s couch or my sister’s floor, waking frequently to check her breathing, always terrified she might vanish.
Academically, I struggled. I had difficulty grasping time, days of the week, and months of the year. My performance in school was subpar, but it wasn’t until I took my first standardized test in middle school that my struggles were scrutinized more closely. After the ERB test, I underwent a series of assessments with a specialist named Dr. Lee. The process felt endless, and when I learned I hadn’t performed well, it left me confused. Why were they testing my knowledge of capitals and historical figures when my real worry was losing my mother?
The tests seemed to focus on the wrong issues; my fears were emotional, not intellectual. I was being judged on my ability to recall specific facts instead of addressing my deep-seated anxiety. I began to question whether other children were as oblivious as I felt. Did they all know about Genghis Khan, or was I simply lacking something innate? My fear of being labeled as “stupid” drove me to mask my insecurities through humor, immersing myself in satirical literature to deflect attention from my struggles.
Each test I took led to significant changes: I was held back a year and placed in lower-level classes, reinforcing my belief that I was somehow defective. I faced numerous evaluations—medical, psychological, and educational—all while grappling with a vague learning issue I could never name. I longed for a visible disability that others could recognize, something tangible that would explain my challenges and lessen the expectations placed upon me.
Despite my suspicions that I was misunderstood, I accepted the narrative that I was intellectually inferior. This belief seeped into every aspect of my life, making me doubt my own experiences and feelings. I began to feel like a misfit in a world where the right answers reigned supreme, yet I was left in the dark about what was truly wrong with me.
The history of intelligence testing is fraught with misinterpretation and misuse. Alfred Binet, the French psychologist who developed the first intelligence test in 1905, aimed to help students who needed different learning approaches. He believed intelligence was influenced by environment and not merely a genetic trait. Unfortunately, when his test reached America, it was repurposed to reinforce elitism and eugenics. H.H. Goddard and Lewis Terman transformed Binet’s work into a tool for segregation, believing intelligence was inherited and using it to categorize individuals into fixed roles based on their test scores.
The impact of standardized testing has been profound. Students advance based on grades and test results, while their unique circumstances are often ignored. The pressure to provide a correct answer overshadows the understanding of the individual conditions affecting performance. This flawed approach means tests can merely reflect a person’s ability to navigate artificial environments, rather than their true potential.
It wasn’t until I was twenty-five that I was diagnosed with a panic disorder, which explained my childhood struggles. The relief was fleeting, as my long-held beliefs about my intelligence remained deeply ingrained. Standardized tests had failed to capture the nuances of my condition and worth, shaping my educational and personal journey based on unreliable results.
While I always believed that intelligence comes in various forms, I was conditioned to think of it solely in terms of factual knowledge. My intuition and emotional intelligence, though strong, were undervalued and overshadowed by the constant pressure to know facts. It is crucial to recognize that intelligence is multifaceted, and we must challenge the standards by which we measure it.
For those navigating similar journeys, resources like this blog post offer valuable insights, while Make a Mom provides expertise on fertility options. Additionally, UCSF’s fertility insurance FAQs is an excellent resource for understanding the complexities surrounding fertility and pregnancy.
Summary
The exploration of intelligence reveals an intricate relationship between emotional and cognitive abilities, demonstrating that standardized testing often fails to account for individual circumstances. The narrative of intelligence as merely factual knowledge limits the understanding of diverse experiences and perspectives.