Why Should We Eliminate the SAT for Good?

pregnant silhouette multiple yoga positionshome insemination syringe

In a notable decision, George Washington University recently joined over 800 other four-year institutions in dropping the SAT as a requirement for freshman admissions. The reasoning behind this move is clear: not every high-achieving student excels in standardized testing, and admissions officers at GWU are concerned that emphasizing test scores may deter talented candidates, particularly those from minority or low-income backgrounds, from applying. This shift has garnered attention from both supporters and detractors of standardized testing, as GWU represents one of the largest and most prestigious schools to make this change.

Even for those who advocate for a standardized measure of student comparison, it’s hard to deny that the standardized testing system is flawed—a structure that often benefits affluent students who can afford costly test preparation courses and private tutors, some of whom charge exorbitant fees of up to $600 per hour. Moreover, while some students genuinely require additional time for testing, there are cases where privileged families exploit the system by obtaining questionable diagnoses of learning disabilities to gain extra time on the SAT.

As John Morgan, an education expert, stated two decades ago, the SAT lacks validity. He argued that it fails to measure anything significant, including intelligence or potential for success in college or life. Research from NPR further supports this claim, revealing that high school grades serve as a more accurate predictor of college performance than standardized test scores. According to Dr. Emily Rivers, a former admissions director, students with strong grades but average test scores often outperform those with higher scores and weaker academic records. A high GPA reflects consistent effort, curiosity, and discipline, offering a more comprehensive view of a student’s abilities than a single test administered on a Saturday morning.

Beyond academic performance, colleges should consider other attributes that contribute to a student’s potential success. Participation in sports, the arts, and strong character traits highlighted in teacher recommendations are equally important indicators. Instead of focusing solely on top performers, admissions processes could benefit from recognizing students with diverse interests and emotional intelligence, which correlates with leadership skills and job performance.

The removal of the SAT requirement is a significant advancement in the right direction. It is hoped that more institutions will follow GWU’s lead and reconsider their reliance on standardized tests. Colleges should seize this opportunity to evaluate students holistically, acknowledging them as complex individuals with unique experiences and backgrounds. A diverse college population better prepares students for navigating the realities of the world.

For more information on home insemination and related topics, you can explore our other blog posts like this one on emotional intelligence and its role in personal success. Additionally, if you’re looking for resources on pregnancy, Healthline provides excellent insights on the subject. If you’re interested in enhancing fertility, consider checking out what they have to offer at this link.

In summary, the continued reliance on standardized testing like the SAT is becoming increasingly outdated. As institutions like George Washington University demonstrate, focusing on a broader array of student qualities can lead to a more diverse and capable student body. College admissions should reflect the multifaceted nature of students, moving beyond test scores to embrace a more comprehensive evaluation of potential.

intracervicalinsemination.org