Discovery Girls, a renowned magazine aimed at tweens, intends to foster a positive self-image among girls aged 8 to 12. However, the recent edition features a three-page spread that provides advice on selecting swimsuits based on different body types. This guidance includes suggestions like:
- “For a straight figure, opt for asymmetrical straps and eye-catching prints to create the illusion of curves!”
- “If you have a rounder midsection, consider busy geometric patterns to draw attention inward!”
- “For girls with fuller hips, highlight the upper body with bold designs!”
As a parent of an 8-year-old girl, I find these recommendations concerning. My daughter’s criteria for choosing a swimsuit are simple: she looks for fun colors and patterns that she enjoys. She is blissfully unaware of her body image and I hope to maintain that innocence for as long as possible. She should not feel pressured to choose a swimsuit that emphasizes or conceals any aspect of her natural prepubescent body.
This article could unintentionally shift the perception of young girls toward their bodies, prompting them to scrutinize their appearance and worry about how to “fix” perceived flaws. Notably, the illustration accompanying this article features a girl with African-American features, which adds another layer of complexity to the discussion.
The oversight in publishing this article is perplexing, especially given that many professionals are involved in the writing and editing processes. Catherine Lee, the magazine’s publisher, expressed her astonishment in an open letter on the magazine’s Facebook page, stating, “It’s hard to believe that an article so contrary to our mission could have made it to print. The aim was to discuss fun swimsuit options that boost confidence, but it unfortunately focused on body image in a negative light.”
While I appreciate the acknowledgment of the issue, I remain puzzled by how this article could have made it through multiple reviews without recognizing its potential impact on impressionable young girls.
This is not an isolated incident. Last year, Lego Friends magazine also faced criticism for providing beauty advice to girls as young as five, suggesting specific haircuts for different face shapes. Following public backlash, Lego issued an apology, making it clear that this kind of messaging is not well-received.
The need for continuous reminders about the implications of discussing body image is evident. It is unacceptable to point out differences in girls’ bodies and suggest how they should alter their appearance. Let children enjoy their youth without the added pressure of conforming to unrealistic beauty standards.
For more insights on parenting and related topics, you can check out this post linked here, or explore resources on pregnancy and home insemination at Healthline for valuable information. If you’re interested in home insemination kits, consider visiting Make a Mom for their expert offerings.
In summary, it is crucial that we allow young girls to appreciate their bodies as they are, without the influence of articles that suggest they need to change for societal acceptance.