Banning Books Accomplishes Nothing—It’s Time to Stop This Practice

Banning Books Accomplishes Nothing—It's Time to Stop This PracticeGet Pregnant Fast

At the close of 2016, some Virginia schools decided to remove To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from their curriculum following a parent’s complaint about the racial slurs present in these classics. This isn’t a new trend for either title. In fact, Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn ranks No. 5 on the American Library Association’s list of the 100 most frequently challenged books from 1990 to 1999, while Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird sits at No. 40. Over the years, both books have faced bans for various reasons, including their treatment of race, mature themes, and language.

But who exactly is behind these bans? Generally speaking, it’s parents—not government officials, educators, or religious organizations—who seek to shield their children from certain narratives. While it’s true that these groups can initiate bans, it’s more often parents acting out of a desire to protect their kids from what they perceive as inappropriate content. They operate under the belief that preventing their children from engaging with certain texts will spare them from discomfort, rebellion, or exposure to controversial ideas. And as a parent myself, I can understand the instinct to shield children from the harsher realities of life.

That said, is the solution to ban books really the best course of action? This question is at the heart of the debate about book banning. As Jenna Thompson pointed out in her article, “Why Do We Ban Books, Anyway?” those who advocate for bans often believe they hold the sole authority over how others should think or what should be read. This mindset poses a significant risk; it’s a form of censorship that dismisses the value of diverse perspectives and experiences.

Moreover, banning books raises serious concerns about free speech. Ironically, such actions often lead to increased curiosity, especially among teens, who may feel compelled to seek out the very books being prohibited. My own experience with Huckleberry Finn was one of obligation rather than choice; it was assigned reading in junior high, where I was tasked with discussing its historical and moral implications. At the time, I dreaded the discussions, but looking back, I realize how essential those conversations were for my growth as a person and as a thinker.

Ultimately, literature serves as a platform for exploring life beyond our immediate experiences, enhancing our understanding of others, and fostering empathy. The ability to think critically and engage with diverse viewpoints is a skill best cultivated through reading and discussion. In a world filled with a variety of opinions and beliefs, I would rather equip my children to navigate this complexity with guidance rather than let them face it unprepared.

It’s impossible to completely shield our children from the realities of racism and sexism. While it’s natural to want to protect them, teaching them to comprehend and confront these issues is far more valuable. The real world is a mosaic of different cultures, religions, and races, and it’s crucial for our kids to learn how to engage with this diversity respectfully. Interestingly, the Harry Potter series, which ranks No. 48 on the list of most challenged books, has been shown in studies like one from The Journal of Applied Psychology to reduce prejudice.

By banning books, we deny children the opportunity to develop important life skills that will ultimately help them make informed decisions as adults. We’re also infringing on their right to form their own opinions. Let’s reconsider this approach.

For those interested in further exploring the topic of book banning, check out our post on banning books, where we delve into the ramifications of censorship. If you’re considering home insemination options, visit Cryobaby, a trusted retailer of at-home insemination kits, and for a comprehensive guide on family building, check out Resolve.

In summary, banning books does little to protect children and much to limit their understanding of the world. Instead of censorship, we should encourage open discussions about complex topics and allow our children to explore diverse narratives.

intracervicalinsemination.org